Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Justin Thornton's column >>

JUSTIN THORNTON

Dex Yellow Pages: the one that gets used
Articles Posted: 7  Links Seeded: 32
Member Since: 1/2006  Last Seen: 2/19/2009

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Poll for Mac Users: Do We Over Do it?

Wed Jul 26, 2006 9:51 AM EDT
technology, apple, mac, computers, poll, pc
By Justin Thornton

Live Poll

Do we Mac Users Get Carried away (mac users only please)

View Results
  • 1970
    Yes
    49%
  • 1971
    No
    51%

VoteTotal Votes: 91

Advertise | AdChoices

Do we give the recommendation of the Mac platform alittle too freely? This comes up because I used to listen the the "Inside Mac podcast" and one of the hosts would always call the PC the heathen box. That bothered me. Do we get to wrapped up in our Mac world?

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • Justin Thornton's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (46)
Deh Ehn

My mom was a mac user. And all while growing up I was sold the Mac propoganda. I was told that using a PC was aking to betraying my mother. So I've stayed loyal to macs and have done a good amount of propogandizing in my time as well. There are a lot of benefits to the macs and they are superior in many ways. But they are also expensive and incompatible in a lot of ways, so they're not for everyone. I eventually had to switch to PCs for my work and finally betrayed my mom. She still gives me crap for it to this day and probably won't stop until I buy another Mac.

To me there's just not enough difference to be so adamently opposed to PC use.

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Jul 26, 2006 10:21 AM EDT
Greg Plancich

We may be a bit over the top in how we do it, but OS X is such a good OS in terms of ease of use, security, elegance, stability, etc. that we are justified in spreading the propaganda.

The facts:
1. There are no viruses for OS X, and, even if one were to be written, due to the archetecture and UNIX structure of OS X, the virus could not affect the system files but could delete your .odfs, .jpgs, and .movs.

2. UNIX is one of the most stable OSs out there and OS X makes full use of it's power. Ever since Jaguar came out, crashes have become a thing of the past. I have never had a kernel panic whereas, my work computer (XP) has to go through at least one forced restart a day.

3. Unbelievably user friendly. Take for example, installing a program in Windows. First you have to open the .exe, accept a EULA, choose where you want to install it to, whether you want desktop shortcuts, quick launch shortcuts, start menu shortcuts, install, restart, and then finally run the program. In OS X however, we just download a .dmg, double-click, and drag the icon to our Applications folder, and unmount the disk.

4. Except for games, there are equivalents for just about every app out there, many of them freeware.

5. Apple is constantly improving OS X. XP came out in 2001 and Vista is now due early 2007. That's a whole six years difference between the two releases and the computing world has changed since then. Apple on the otherhand, is readying to release their sixth version of OS X in just about the same amount of time. While six releases in six years is a bit much (Apple has said that they are going to slow down their release cycle), each release has been an awesome improvement over the last and (especially with Tiger), I always wonder how they could make it better.

I could go on, but I've sort of digressed from the original question. My answer is, no we don't over do it, but some people, go about it the wrong way.

  • 6 votes
Reply#2 - Wed Jul 26, 2006 10:43 AM EDT
zero303

"my work computer (XP) has to go through at least one forced restart a day."

Are these forced as in crashes or because of installations and updates? My work computer, home computer and laptop (all XP) never require forced restarts because of crashes. My PCs just do not crash.

  • 4 votes
#2.1 - Wed Jul 26, 2006 10:52 AM EDT
Greg Plancich

They are due to crashes. My (work) computer has 512MB of RAM, 40GB HDD, and a 2.4GHz P4 and it still manages to freeze and subsequently crash when I am only running Outlook, IE (because Security won't let us install Opera or Firefox), Office Communicator, and our Call Logging program.

None of these programs are particularly resource intensive, even on 512MB of RAM.

  • 1 vote
#2.2 - Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:01 AM EDT
PJ Davis

That's very odd, Because at work, i'm on a CelronD 330 (2.66ghz) with 512 Ram, and it never gets turned off, except when the power goes out, and it has never (since I've been here) crashed, and that was a year and a half ago.

  • 3 votes
#2.3 - Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:20 AM EDT
icarus4586

The problem with anecdotal evidence on stability is that there are so many things that influence a system's stability. If you've had troubles with a Mac or a PC in the past, that doesn't in any way mean that that platform is more likely to crash.

It seems like every operating system offers greater stability than every other one. From what I've seen, no matter what platform you're on (with the exception of older versions of Windows), if you see instability, it's probably caused by a faulty piece of hardware, or some software that doesn't "play nicely" with the system.

  • 3 votes
#2.4 - Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:28 AM EDT
Greg Plancich

It's funny, I work in the IT Department at work and deal with Windows all day. I know how to troubleshoot many obscure problems and many regular problems. But at the end of the day, even for me, Windows just crashes and my 12" Powerbook G4 1GHz, with 512MB RAM, 80GB HDD does not, even when I'm running PS CS2, Illustrator CS2, Firefox (with many tabs open), Mail, Adium, iTunes, along with about ten widgets and a few other things (Virtue Desktops, iScrobbler).

I've grown up on Windows and I know it through and through, but in my opinion, the last good version was 3.11.

  • 4 votes
#2.5 - Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:30 AM EDT
Smaran

Greg, convince your company's boss (or yourself, if you own it) to buy you a MacMini. They're way cooler and about the same price as that "Heathen" on your Desktop. Wow, that sounds eeev-uhl.

  • 1 vote
#2.6 - Thu Jul 27, 2006 1:51 AM EDT
Ilyanep

I agree with all of your points wholeheartedly, but:

5. Apple is constantly improving OS X. XP came out in 2001 and Vista is now due early 2007. That's a whole six years difference between the two releases and the computing world has changed since then. Apple on the otherhand, is readying to release their sixth version of OS X in just about the same amount of time. While six releases in six years is a bit much (Apple has said that they are going to slow down their release cycle), each release has been an awesome improvement over the last and (especially with Tiger), I always wonder how they could make it better.

XP came out with two service pakcs (each with new features), both of which were free and the massiveness of them were akin to a new OS X release.

    #2.7 - Tue Aug 1, 2006 1:32 PM EDT
    Reply
    Damon S.

    Yeah, I have seen a few of us go a bit too overboard. I used to, but not anymore. There are things Macs can do well, and then there are times when Windows can kick butt. Just don't start harping on me about Macs being better than Windows and vice-versa. I'm not stupid. I grew up with a foot on both fields.

      Reply#3 - Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:12 AM EDT
      gecko85

      I recommend Mac all the time, but I'm certainly not over the top about it...And I ALWAYS qualify my recommendation first, to make sure what the person really needs. I recommend Windows machines, too, depending on the situation. It's just that in almost every instance I can safely recommend a Mac.

      My "support" calls from friends and family who've moved to Mac have gone way down. Once they get past the initial "it's different" phase (usually happens pretty quick), the calls go down to almost nothing. Every now and then I'll get a call or email asking for software recommendations...

      • 1 vote
      Reply#4 - Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:22 AM EDT
      pseudonihilist

      Up until a year ago, for about seventeen years I used a PC at work and a Mac at home. Over that time I came to think of it as "reptile at work, mammal at home". I also came to realize that had the Mac originally been the dominant platform, there is no way the PC would ever have been able to gain any market share whatsoever, whereas the Mac was able to do the reverse simply because of its inherent superiority. Yes, at times I curse my twenty-month old G5, but then I remember what Wintel is like. With DOS and eventually Windows, Bill Gates perpetrated one of the greatest hoaxes in the history of the world.

      • 4 votes
      Reply#5 - Wed Jul 26, 2006 11:53 AM EDT
      Shadybird Johnson

      I use a Mac myself but personally I don't care what software people use. I'm just glad I have an excuse now when people come to me begging for free tech support. I just tell them I use a Mac and don't really have any spyware/virus problems. Sorry, can't help you....

      • 1 vote
      Reply#6 - Wed Jul 26, 2006 1:10 PM EDT
      madmari

      I use a Mac at home and I use a PC at work. Neither of them crashes but my I'm running Win 2000 on my work PC which is much more stable than XP. My co-workers with XP systems complain about crashing, slowness and other problems with their PC's.

        Reply#7 - Wed Jul 26, 2006 3:26 PM EDT
        Dr Juice

        I use a Mac myself but personally I don't care what software people use.

        My sentiments exactly. At the end of the day, the tools you use aren't important if you can still get the job done. Both platforms have strengths and weaknesses, and it's impossible to say that one is verifiably better than the other. It's a matter of preference, really.

        To answer the original question, though: I think we as a community tend to think that simply "switching sides" is the answer to everything-and it's not. Windows developers have no use for a Mac (at least not in the corporate environment). Hardcore gamers, modders, and upgraders have no use for a Mac. Some people do, some don't, and some people can get buy on either platform. My parents can do everything they need to on a Mac-and they'll never buy one. Because for them, Windows is good enough-and there are a great many people who are just looking for "good enough."

        There are certain things that the Mac platform does better than Windows, and there are certain things the Windows platform does better. Like I said, it's a matter of preference.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#8 - Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:30 PM EDT
        gecko85

        Hardcore gamers, modders, and upgraders have no use for a Mac.

        Exactly the reason I always qualify my recommendations...Although, really, I don't run across many hard-core gamers asking which platform and/or computer to buy. By the time they become "hard-core", they're usually building and modding their own systems...

        • 1 vote
        #8.1 - Wed Jul 26, 2006 6:46 PM EDT
        Reply
        Devo

        I'll use whatever's in front of me, but mac is my preference. I had a PC and a mac that I used all day - which gave me the chance to run the same apps on different platforms. Not only do enjoy the experience more on a mac, but almost every day I would run (with AV in the background) hijack this, adaware, spybot as well as sort my syst32 directory by date to see what new silent bugs hitched a ride. I'm careful, but they still get in. With macs, I simply spend more time "working" and less time "operating". Stuff just works.

        I think the platform is helped by evangelists, but the zealots just give fodder to the stereotype for the tech writers to spout given an opening. Really, if I didnt know an alternative existed, I'd get by on a pc just fine.

        When my mother upgraded the computer however, I said go PC. She didn't know anyone with a mac, and she calls with very basic questions (usually something like "It says click to continue, what do I do?"). The mac was just too scary.

          Reply#9 - Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:42 PM EDT
          accordingtome

          Bad idea for a poll in my opinion. Too easily distorted.

          • 2 votes
          Reply#10 - Wed Jul 26, 2006 4:48 PM EDT
          Justin Thornton

          Now is this comment really needed, please.

          • 2 votes
          #10.1 - Wed Jul 26, 2006 7:07 PM EDT
          Levi

          Notice he doesn't have in votes.

          • 2 votes
          #10.2 - Thu Jul 27, 2006 5:49 AM EDT
          accordingtome

          Are either of those comments really needed? Ooh, ooh I didn't get any votes, that really hurt. :(

            #10.3 - Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:49 PM EDT
            Levi

            Wow, its like arguing with a little child.

            • 2 votes
            #10.4 - Thu Jul 27, 2006 1:29 PM EDT
            accordingtome

            Something I missed? We had an argument? How about you spend less time trying to insult people. You make the comment "hurr hurr notice he doesn't have any votes" -- That's childish. I stated my opinion and now I have yours so we can move on now.

            • 2 votes
            #10.5 - Thu Jul 27, 2006 4:16 PM EDT
            Levi

            I apologize for my remarks. Its just that your comments were not practically nice on your part. Anyways this argument is pointless.

            • 1 vote
            #10.6 - Thu Jul 27, 2006 9:29 PM EDT
            Reply
            Jack Tams

            Macs are great, but you have to be pragmatic. Your never gonna switch a lifetime windows user, and you have acknowledge that windows is the only options for some applications, although this is becoming less of a problem.

              Reply#11 - Wed Jul 26, 2006 5:25 PM EDT
              sbar

              I really enjoy when friends say..."I could NEVER use a Mac. I can't stand them" .... followed up by "It's not possible that Macs don't have the issues that my Windows PC has!! ALL computers have them! All computers must freeze, suck with networks, suck installing programs, etc. etc. etc." ad nauseum.

              And they are so used to the format of Windows that they'll never go outside of the box and get comfortable in another system (I'm bi-system) because it "doesn't work like Windows does".

              Nope. Thanks, I'll keep my user-friendly computer.

              Disclaimer: Not all Windows-users are like this. Just a friend or two of mine.

                #11.1 - Wed Jul 26, 2006 8:19 PM EDT
                Ilyanep

                I'm a lifetime Windows user and was seriously considering getting a Macbook Pro for next year.

                I will get one for college [the college discounts are amazing].

                  #11.2 - Tue Aug 1, 2006 1:34 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  Brian Ford

                  I actually said no -- and I believe it -- but this poll is a little like saying:

                  Is Brian Ford Awesome:

                  Yes

                  No

                  (Please do not reply if you are not Brian Ford.)

                  For what it's worth, I happen to think that a lot of the "rabidness" comes from Mac users too willing to take troll bait and then having to hear:

                  "See, you guys are such @!$%#s about your beloved platform."

                  After a passionate defense prompted by a purposefully angry attack.

                  I can't really think of one time that I ever talked about how great a Mac was to a person who didn't either:

                  Bring it up.

                  or

                  Ask for information regarding computers in an effort to make a purchase decision.

                  In fact, I generally go out of my way to avoid talking about it to a lot of people. Don't really want to have to justify my choice. Fortunately, popular opinion seems to be changing and it's no longer a choice that "needs" to be justified.

                  • 3 votes
                  Reply#12 - Wed Jul 26, 2006 5:27 PM EDT
                  Nathan R. Hale

                  I have many mac users as friends. The music world (my world) is dominated by them. They are awesome examples of design and functionality. I really, truly believe this. I know tons of great, awesome people that use macs. I've got no money, so I use linux (which I think is an equally awesome OS for its own reasons).

                  The main reason I don't buy a mac is though, is this:

                  As a child (10 or 12 years old probably) I was really getting in to computers (PCs, cause we were poor and that was when Macs were horribly expensive) and I went to friend's house. He asked me what my hobbies were...I said, oh I really computers. Then I explained my latest adventure in Win 3.11 and I got a ridiculing look followed by a sneer and "oh you're a PC user. I use a Mac" and from then on he never took anything I said about computers seriously. Before this, I didn't know what a Mac was. I still associate that feeling of being attacked and looked down upon with the platform.

                  It makes me sad that I still recieve that same attitude from many mac users. I know that every mac user is not like this. I know they are great machines. I also know, however, that a machine is never worth making another human being feel like crap.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#13 - Wed Jul 26, 2006 10:48 PM EDT
                  Greg Plancich

                  Whoever that punk is, he was a fool. Around that time, he was probably using something like System 5, 6, or 7, which, as we all know pale in comparison to Windows 3.11 (also known as the best OS ever made).

                  • 2 votes
                  #13.1 - Wed Jul 26, 2006 10:54 PM EDT
                  Reply
                  Smaran

                  I think the Heathen statement is a bit harsh, but I don't think we really overdo it, since Mac OS X is really so @!$%#ing awesome! I think if we really over-did it, there'd be war-campaigns to destroy every Windows PC on the face of this earth. Before you criticise us for being so mad about Mac, why don't you sniff some yourself? Well, you obviously don't want to. That's why an addict cannot be rationed with. Either fly with Lucy in the diamond-filled sky, or just look at us Da Vincis and sigh.

                  • 1 vote
                  Reply#14 - Thu Jul 27, 2006 1:46 AM EDT
                  Megido

                  I think its all a matter of personal preferences and needs. I myself have been a lifelong PC user. Back in the early-mid 90s I would have been lost without the classic Sierra and Lucasarts games. To this day I am an avid gamer and also enjoy building my own computers. Personally a friend of mine was pissed when he bought a new g5 and my home built PC out performed his all over the place and I only paid half of what he did. For that reason my main system is and always will be a PC. However, I am also an avid photographer and have always said that if I were to ever get a laptop it would most surely be a mac.

                    Reply#15 - Thu Jul 27, 2006 1:52 AM EDT
                    sieb

                    I use both. Both XP and OSX have their quirks, I can do some stuff faster in XP than I can in OSX (mainly because XP is the native platform of many apps I use) but OSX has an endless amount of freeware/shareware apps to choose from whereas just about every app for Windows is bloated and over priced/hyped. There is no End All Be All, its all personal preference and usage. I personally like the piece of mind of not having to worry about spyware/virii/etc on my Macbook which is now my primary system. But then again, being a savy PC user, I never really worried about them on my XP machine, but had to be mindful of the possibility. I also manage both Linux and Windows 2k3 servers in production environments and being savvy enough to use all of the different platforms is in your best advantage. Putting down anyone who's not a Mac user is a pointless venture and only proves show your own single-minded short-sightedness. To encourage others to try out a Mac as an alternative is the basis of the Mac user base.

                      Reply#16 - Thu Jul 27, 2006 8:15 AM EDT
                      Mokar

                      "whereas, my work computer (XP) has to go through at least one forced restart a day. "

                      this is insane. i've never had a PC need this, not even my old win98 box. if someone has to restart their XP machine every day, they need to stop using their CD tray as a cupholder.

                      apple will never have a higher market share b/c apple users are so obnoxious. i use an apple at work sometimes and it works fine, but i shudder to join the ranks of such an arrogant bunch by buying an apple for home.

                      "With DOS and eventually Windows, Bill Gates perpetrated one of the greatest hoaxes in the history of the world. "

                      comments like this make me sick, and I hear them from mac users every day. ugh. grow up.

                        Reply#17 - Thu Jul 27, 2006 9:04 AM EDT
                        Faruk Ates

                        Your comments towards Mac users are absolutely no different, which goes to show that Mac users are no more or less annoying than PC users.

                        If you want arrogance, try convincing a hardcore Linux user to use a visual mail client. He'll give you a look as if you're not even worthy of a response.

                        • 1 vote
                        #17.1 - Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:52 PM EDT
                        Nathan R. Hale

                        LOL. I use linux almost exlusively...but I'm not that hardcore! I love a good gui. I tried to use mutt once (a popular text-mode email client). I gave up very quickly.

                        There a jerks everywhere.

                          #17.2 - Thu Jul 27, 2006 8:10 PM EDT
                          Reply
                          Faruk Ates

                          Calling a PC a "heathen box" is overdoing it (and then some!). Getting excited and enthusiastic about Macs is not, because for most people Mac OS X really is a wonderful improvement over the Windows user experience.

                          It's not like Mac users (in general) are activists trying to "spread the word" — they're just excited about something, much like how people in general get excited about cool movies they saw, awesome games they played, excellent albums they listened to, and so forth. The difference between the Mac and all those things is that there's a lot more to be said about Macs because it's such a bigger thing, and plays a bigger part of your life.

                          You watch a movie for about 2 hours and that's generally it, but you easily use a computer 4-5 hours at home and many people use it for 8 hours at work, every single day.

                          You can listen to an album on repeat but after you've shown your excitement about the 12-15 songs on there, there really isn't all that much more to be said about it. With a computer, there are countless of apps with countless of features each, and if only one percent of all those things are cool, that's a lot more to be talking about.

                          You can play a game as much as you'd like, but unless you're going to highlight every plot twist of Xenogears, you won't have all that much to talk about. With a Mac, you can be using it for a year and still discover completely new, cool things on a weekly if not daily basis.

                          A lot of Windows users, however, don't really get why someone would get excited about an Operating System — and I can't say I blame them for it. It is pretty weird, if you think about it, but if you think about it a little more, you'll realize that for a lot of people, an Operating System is not just a tool. It's the root-level interface into most everything we do these days, and if you're used to your OS "just" being your OS and suddenly you get an OS that does so much more than that, it's hard to not get excited over it.

                          Imagine if you'd figured out a way to breathe that, unlike the "regular" way, made you feel all happy and much more energetic — would you not get excited about that?

                          • 2 votes
                          Reply#18 - Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:48 PM EDT
                          Mokar

                          fair enough...that's a good way of looking at it.

                            #18.1 - Sat Jul 29, 2006 1:48 PM EDT
                            Reply
                            zero303

                            I am a life long PC user but I do find myself having very strong urges to get a mac to go alonside my (lol) "heathen box"...

                            However, I make a living from two sources: .net programming and design using PS/AI...

                            .Net will always tie me to PC (don't scream mono, until you can offer a genuine Visual Studio alternative) and I've used just about every web tech alternative apart from Ruby on Rails and I've not seen enough to feel the need to jump ship and re-train...

                            As for design, well I can't even do that on a mac until Adobe ships PS/AI that will actually run properly on an intel mac.

                            I really, really would like to get one but what could I possibly gain from using one? Especially when I can look after a Windows PC and keep it running fast and stable?

                            Hurry up with CS3 Adobe...

                              Reply#19 - Tue Aug 1, 2006 6:18 AM EDT
                              Dr Juice

                              Aside from the wait for a Universal CS3, you could run .NET in Parallels or Boot Camp, or whatever new virtualization system Apple may build into Leopard.

                              I really, really would like to get one but what could I possibly gain from using one? Especially when I can look after a Windows PC and keep it running fast and stable?

                              I can't tell you, none of us can, since we don't know how you use your computer and what you want and need from your system. Reliance on various pieces of Windows-only software isn't much of a big deal anymore, though I must admit I don't know how various programs run within Parallels or Boot Camp. But as you said "I really, really would like to get one," so why not? Do some research, see if anyone else is running Visual Studio on an Intel Mac.

                                #19.1 - Tue Aug 1, 2006 9:57 AM EDT
                                zero303

                                Visual Studio is an MS only app and quite an intense one too so I owuldn't like to imagine it running under some kind of virtual environment.

                                For me the big wait will be Adobe CS3 I think...

                                  #19.2 - Tue Aug 1, 2006 11:16 AM EDT
                                  Faruk Ates

                                  Waiting for CS3 is kind of like waiting for the intercity train at a station while there's a regular line waiting in front of you, with the next stop (for both trains) being your destination.

                                  I run Photoshop on an intel iMac and I'm not noticing Rosetta-slowdowns at all. Why? 2GB of RAM.

                                  Get 2GB (very useful if you do any design work anyway) and you're really set. I opened four Office:mac Word documents at the same time earlier, and thought that "oh, did I have Word running already?" because they pretty much showed up instantaneously. Nope, Word actually booted up in a fraction of a second and opened the four files.

                                  Seriously, holding out for another full year (or something close to that) for CS3 is not worth it. Beef up your Intel Mac with RAM and you are going to be happy as a pig in sh!t. My iMac is making me very happy, fastest machine I've ever done my rather intensive work on, by far.

                                    #19.3 - Tue Aug 1, 2006 12:30 PM EDT
                                    Justin Thornton

                                    How fast does a multi layered tiff take save?

                                    • 2 votes
                                    #19.4 - Tue Aug 1, 2006 12:35 PM EDT
                                    gecko85

                                    Visual Studio is an MS only app and quite an intense one too so I owuldn't like to imagine it running under some kind of virtual environment.

                                    If you use Boot Camp, it's not a virtual environment at all...it's a "PC" running Windows XP natively. No different than any other PC...except of course you can boot back into OSX when you feel like it.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #19.5 - Tue Aug 1, 2006 12:41 PM EDT
                                    Faruk Ates

                                    I don't have nor ever use TIFF's o_O

                                    If you want, I can try and dig up a big Photoshop file on my home Powerbook, open it in there, time it, take it to work tomorrow and open it on my iMac here and time that. I'll test that with all applications closed and only Photoshop CS 2 already running — sound good?

                                      #19.6 - Tue Aug 1, 2006 12:41 PM EDT
                                      Faruk Ates

                                      Visual Studio is an MS only app and quite an intense one too so I owuldn't like to imagine it running under some kind of virtual environment.

                                      tcervo already pointed out that Boot Camp isn't a virtual environment, but Parallels isn't really one either. It runs Windows XP Natively, just hosted inside Mac OS X so you're running two OS's at the same time and that can cause a slowdown, depending on how many Mac apps you've got running as well.

                                      If you really need the performance, I recommend Boot Camp though.

                                        #19.7 - Tue Aug 1, 2006 12:44 PM EDT
                                        Reply
                                        Leave a Comment:
                                        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                        You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                                        (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                                        Newsvine Privacy Statement
                                        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                        FUN STUFF:
                                        • Leaderboard |
                                        • E-Mail Alerts |
                                        • Top of the Vine |
                                        • Newsvine Live |
                                        • Newsvine Archives |
                                        • The Greenhouse |
                                        COMPANY STUFF:
                                        • Code of Honor |
                                        • Company Info |
                                        • Contact Us |
                                        • Jobs |
                                        • User Agreement |
                                        • Privacy Policy |
                                        • About our ads
                                        LEGAL STUFF:
                                        • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                                        • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                                        • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com